Compensation for use of separate property post-separation…

Separation often raises difficult issues about property division.

While the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 provides legal guidelines for dividing relationship property, disputes frequently arise when one party continues to occupy or use an asset post-separation that legally belongs to both, or to the other party.

A common issue is whether the non-occupying party can seek compensation for the other’s sole use of a property after separation but before final division.

The PRA is designed to achieve a “just division” of relationship property when a relationship ends. One party’s sole post-separation use of relationship property, or the other party’s separate property, can create unfairness, justifying a monetary adjustment out of the relationship property pool of assets. The Court has recognised compensation principles for the unfair issues within the law.

In determining relationship property division the Court may consider any contribution made by either party after separation in respect of the relationship property or the other party’s separate property.

The “contribution” may include direct and indirect contributions, as follows:

• payments towards outgoings (mortgage, rates, insurance);
• improvements or maintenance on the property;
• preserving or managing the assets;
• repaying any joint debts; and
• certain non-financial contributions.

Although the law does not provide mandatory compensation for use of separate property post-separation, relevant pragmatic solutions are developed within the law.

Specifically, occupation rent or other adjustments are considered to achieve fairness and ensure that neither party is disadvantaged during the period before final settlement of property.

The Court may approach this issue by ordering a party to pay the other party a sum of money. For instance, where one party occupies the family home, the other party may apply to the Court for an order for “occupational rent” to compensate for the lost ability to use or benefit from the property.

Another approach is adjusting the shares between the parties. Rather than awarding money, the Court typically adjusts shares upon division, reducing the occupying party’s entitlement or crediting the non-occupying party out of the value of other property.

If the Court considers it “just”, it may also order a party to transfer to the other party any property that is relationship property or separate property.

To decide the compensation relevant considerations include:

• whether the occupying party paid mortgage, rates, and maintenance expenses;
• the duration of sole occupation;
• whether the non-occupying party was excluded from reasonable use; and
• the fairness of awarding compensation in light of the overall division.

For example, if party A remains in the family home for two years post-separation, while party B moves out of it and continues to contribute to the mortgage and rates, the court may award party B compensation by increasing their share in the final settlement.

However, if party A remains in the home but bears all ownership costs and party B incurs no loss the court may decline to order compensation.

It is important to carefully document post-separation arrangements, such as classifying separate property and relationship property, who paid outgoings, who had access to the property, and whether consent to occupation was given. These facts can affect whether compensation is appropriate.

Leading law firms committed to helping clients cost-effectively will have a range of fixed-price Initial Consultations to suit most people’s needs in quickly learning what their options are.  At Rainey Collins we have an experienced team who can answer your questions and put you on the right track.

Please note that Rainey Collins is not contracted to provide Legal Aid, other than in the Treaty of Waitangi area.  We therefore are unable to take on any Civil or Family Legal Aid work. If you require Legal Aid in those areas, you can search the list of Legal Aid lawyers on the Ministry of Justice website.